The ‘low FODMAP diet’ is probably a name many of us here are familiar with. But did you know that another type of diet approach may be used to manage gastrointestinal symptoms in IBS patients? In this blog we will be exploring a diet approach based on the ‘NICE guidelines’. We will also be looking at a study that compares the nutrient content of a 4-week low FODMAP diet versus a NICE guidelines diet in meals consumed by patients with diarrhoea-dominant IBS (IBS-D) (1).
In 2008, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) from the UK published guidelines on diagnosing and managing IBS. The guideline was last updated in 2017 and has recommended dietary and lifestyle management as first-line therapy. If an IBS patient does not respond to such changes, a low FODMAP diet can be trialled (2).
The NICE guidelines not only cover the restriction of particular types of foods (such as foods high in insoluble fibre, resistant starch and alcohol drinks) that may exacerbate symptoms, but it also makes eating behaviour recommendations.
We have summarised the key similarities and differences between the two diets in the table below.
|NICE guidelines diet
|Low FODMAP diet
|How it works
|A relatively holistic approach that reduces potential triggers for symptom exacerbation from both diet and non-diet management
|FODMAPs are a group of sugars that are not completely digested or absorbed in our intestines. When they reach the small intestine, FODMAPs attract water, and when they pass into the large intestine, FODMAPs are fermented by gut bacteria, producing gas. The extra gas and water causes the intestinal wall to stretch and expand, which triggers symptoms of pain and discomfort in people with IBS.
|What is included and excluded
-Avoidance of foods rich in sorbitol, resistant starch, insoluble fibre, and other potential dietary triggers, such as carbonated drinks, alcohol and caffeinated drinks
-Adequate fluid intake
-Eat regularly and slowly, while avoiding large gaps between meals
|Provides a specific list of foods that are high in FODMAPs which should be replaced with low FODMAP alternatives, based on symptom severity
-May help establish a healthy relationship with foods simultaneously
-Less stringent to follow
|-High-quality evidence to confirm its effectiveness in IBS patients
Although previous studies have compared the clinical symptoms after a low FODMAP diet versus a NICE guidelines diet, there has yet to be a study that compares the nutrient intake between the two diets. Therefore, this study sought to compare the nutrient composition of meals between a 4-week low FODMAP diet (restriction phase) and a NICE guidelines diet in IBS-D patients.
This study included North American adult participants diagnosed with IBS-D. Participants were recruited for a previous study comparing a low FODMAP diet and a NICE guidelines diet on abdominal symptoms.
Participants were first monitored for their IBS symptoms during a 2-week screening period. They were then randomly assigned to either the low FODMAP diet or a slightly modified version of the NICE guidelines diet for four weeks. Participants on the NICE guidelines diet were instructed to:
-Eat small, frequent meals
-Avoid trigger foods
-Avoid excess alcohol and caffeine
Research dietitians provided both groups with counselling on their allocated diet.
Data were collected from 78 patients who completed the study, with 41 in the low FODMAP group and 37 in the NICE guidelines group. In order to gather data about the nutritional composition of their meals, participants were asked to complete a 3-day food record before and during the final week of their 4-week diet.
Before we look into the results, let’s quickly refresh our minds on what macronutrients and micronutrients are with the table below.
|What they are
|Nutrients that we need in large amounts to provide us with energy and maintain our body structure
|Nutrients that we need in small amounts to help with energy production, immune function (and many other purposes too of course!)
|Protein, fat, carbohydrates and dietary fibre
|Vitamins, minerals, antioxidants
The daily intake of most nutrients remained overall stable, and energy intake decreased in the low FODMAP group. Riboflavin (also known as vitamin B2) was the only micronutrient with a decreased intake at the end of the 4-week study. On the other hand, the intake of vitamin A, C, E, K, niacin (vitamin B3), vitamin B6, copper and magnesium increased. This result supports that a nutritious diet can still be achieved while following a low FODMAP diet in the short-term.
In contrast, participants that consumed the NICE guidelines diet had no changes in the micronutrient intake throughout the study period.
For the remainder of macro- and micronutrients, intake amounts were maintained throughout the four weeks for both groups.
You may be wondering, ‘so which diet works better’? Let’s take a quick look at studies that compared the effectiveness of the two diets.
-In the earlier trial that this study was based on, the low FODMAP diet led to greater symptom improvement (3).
-This finding is consistent with the results of two other studies showing the low FODMAP diet is more effective (4, 5) in reducing symptoms. However, there are also studies that found both diets reduced symptoms (6, 7).
-The NICE guidelines also recommend increasing physical activity and leisure time, which may help if your IBS symptoms are caused or exacerbated by psychological conditions.
-This study only focused on the nutritional changes of both diets in the short-term. However, a recent study that observed the long-term effects of following all three steps of the FODMAP diet may shed some light on this issue.
If you are an IBS patient and would like to follow either one of these diets, speaking with a Monash FODMAP trained dietitian is an excellent way to keep your symptoms at bay while ensuring your nutrient intake is not compromised.
1. Eswaran S, Dolan RD, Ball SC, et al. The Impact of a 4-Week Low-FODMAP and mNICE Diet on Nutrient Intake in a Sample of US Adults with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2020;120(4):641-9.
2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Irritable bowel syndrome in adults. 3rd ed. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2017.
3. Eswaran SL, Chey WD, Han-Markey T, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Low FODMAP Diet vs. Modified NICE Guidelines in US Adults with IBS-D. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(12):1824-32.
4. Zahedi MJ, Behrouz V, Azimi M. Low fermentable oligo-di-mono-saccharides and polyols diet versus general dietary advice in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2018;33(6):1192-9.
5. Staudacher HM, Whelan K, Irving PM, et al. Comparison of symptom response following advice for a diet low in fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs) versus standard dietary advice in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 2011;24(5):487-95.
6. Böhn L, Störsrud S, Liljebo T, et al. Diet Low in FODMAPs Reduces Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome as Well as Traditional Dietary Advice: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(6):1399-407.e2.
7. Yeung W-y, Ng GW-b, Cheung W-h, et al. IDDF2021-ABS-0135 A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of low fodmap dietary advice and nice dietary advice on symptom control and quality of life in chinese adults with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2021;70(Suppl 2):A132-A.